I was looking at the archives and there was a thread about "calcium consultation". Owen you asked
I have no strong opinions on so-called Oral Chelation. Can you find anyone who felt it was of benefit?
I had a patient (I'm a chirpractor, licensed but not practicing now). I had been seeing this husband and wife for a couple of years. The man had heart failure. It scared him and he progressively became more and more of a nervous wreck. I was worried about the extent of his fear. They were both really knowledable abut herbs and other natural remedies, but nthing would overcome this. Then I hadn't seen them for a while.
Then they came in one day just beaming. He had been taking a supplement with EDTA and some other things in it. They suddenly had started noticing he was getting better. Before he really could do nothing physical. A few months after beginning the supplement he was able to go outside and chop a big tree into firewood. I ordered some myself, but since I wasn't having any trouble then, I never took it regularly. In fact I still have it.
I think the confusion may come in the word chelation. I looked it up and it is a fairly new word. If you allow yourself to let it include anything that willl safely get rid of plaque, like dissolving it, such as the Pauling protocol does, (I read that in one of his talks) then they are the same thing.
On Wikipedia part of the definition says " Because chelating agents bind to metals through more than one coordination site, such ligands bind more tenaciously than unidentate ligands (like water). If a chelate were replaced by several monodentate ligands (such as water or ammonia), the total number of molecules would decrease, whereas if several monodentate ligands were replaced by a chelate, the number of free molecules increases.
That sounds like a bunch of Greek honestly, but, both EDTA and ascorbic acid have 2 binding sites rather than one, makingthem more effective as "chelators". If anyone has studied this and can explain this better, I'd appreciate it.